The Opacity of Mind

It is widely believed that people have privileged and authoritative access to their own thoughts, and many theories have been proposed to explain this supposed fact. The Opacity of Mind challenges the consensus view and subjects the theories in question to critical scrutiny, while showing that
they are not protected against the findings of cognitive science by belonging to a separate "explanatory space." The book argues that our access to our own thoughts is almost always interpretive, grounded in perceptual awareness of our own circumstances and behavior, together with our own sensory
imagery (including inner speech). In fact our access to our own thoughts is no different in principle from our access to the thoughts of other people, utilizing the conceptual and inferential resources of the same "mindreading" faculty, and relying on many of the same sources of evidence. Peter
Carruthers proposes and defends the Interpretive Sensory-Access (ISA) theory of self-knowledge. This is supported through comprehensive examination of many different types of evidence from across cognitive science, integrating a diverse set of findings into a single well-articulated theory. One
outcome is that there are hardly any kinds of conscious thought. Another is that there is no such thing as conscious agency.

Written with Carruthers' usual clarity and directness, this book will be essential reading for philosophers interested in self-knowledge, consciousness, and related areas of philosophy. It will also be of vital interest to cognitive scientists, since it casts the existing data in a new theoretical
light. Moreover, the ISA theory makes many new predictions while also suggesting constraints and controls that should be placed on future experimental investigations of self-knowledge.


"The Opacity of Mind is a terrific book. In a nutshell, the plot is this: Gilbert Ryle meets contemporary cognitive science, and together they produce a novel and exciting theory of self-knowledge.... This hardly scratches the surface of Carruthers's rich and thought-provoking book. Many other
topics are discussed at length: mental architecture, inner sense theories, third-person mindreading, alleged dissociations between self- and other-knowledge, the evidence for widespread confabulation, and much more. As is usual with Carruthers's work, the book is packed with numerous references to
the empirical literature -- a welcome corrective to work on self-knowledge which blithely disregards it. The Opacity of Mind contains much to disagree with, but also much to learn."--Alex Byrne, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

"The Opacity of Mind offers a vigorous defence of the startling view that self-knowledge is based on error prone inferences from sensory experience rather than direct access to what we are thinking. Drawing heavily on cognitive science, Peter Carruthers makes his radical thesis look eminently
reasonable, and he delivers fatal blows to the competition."--Jesse Prinz, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, City University of New York

"In this terrific book, Peter Carruthers aims to show that current theories of our knowledge of our own mental states don't sit at all well with our best theories of how the mind works. Carruthers also proposes and defends a radical alternative theory, which he succeeds in lending an impressive
degree of support with appeal to both philosophical argumentation and a wealth of considerations drawn from recent work in cognitive science and related areas. In doing so, he offers a model of how an enduring and central philosophical issue can be fruitfully engaged in an empirically-informed
manner. Philosophers of mind and epistemologists continue to be fascinated by our knowledge of our own mental lives; such readers will be fascinated by Carruthers's book, whether or not they agree with its deeply revisionary conclusions."--Aidan McGlynn, Philosophical Quarterly

"This is undoubtedly a rich and provocative book.... The Opacity of Mind is a challenging and provocative book, informed by an extraordinary knowledge of scientific psychology and cognitive science. Carruthers certainly places a formidable burden on anyone challenging the key ideas of the ISA theory
-- in particular, to anyone who wants to maintain any sort of transparent access to propositional attitudes."
Jos� Berm�dez, Mind

"Those familiar with the scholarship in this area will find here a substantive, well-defended alternative to existing accounts in the study of self-knowledge. Any adequate discussion of this issue will need to take into account Carruther's view and the argument he marshals in support of it.
Moreover, the clarity and thoroughness that Carruthers brings to the subject makes the book more than suitable for introducing students to the role of philosophy in the interdisciplinary study of human cognition."--CHOICE

"The Opacity of Mind: An Integrative Theory of Self-Knowledge is a complex and thought-provoking book. Drawing on both recent empirical research in a wide range of psychological disciplines as well as on various conceptual hypotheses, Carruthers presents a new approach to theories of
self-knowledge.... I think that Carruthers' book provides a
stimulating scene on which to reconsider both one's intuitions and theories about the
nature and status of self-knowledge." --Philosophical Psychology