Centralization vs Decentralization of Information Systems

This annotated bibliography, "Centralization vs Decentralization of Information Systems," by John F. Rockart and Joav Steve Leventer, explores the historical debate surrounding the optimal structure for managing information within organizations. It provides a comprehensive overview of the arguments for both centralized and decentralized approaches to information systems, offering valuable insights into the factors that influence this critical decision.

The bibliography serves as a resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to understand the evolution of thought on information management strategies. It is particularly relevant for those studying organizational structure, information technology management, and the strategic alignment of IT with business goals. The work captures a moment in the development of IT strategy and offers a grounded perspective on enduring questions.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.