Natural Law Jurisprudence in U S Supreme Court Cases since Roe v Wade Anthem Studies in Law Eth

by [Nemeth, Charles P.]
click to view more

Natural Law Jurisprudence in U S Supreme Court Cases since Roe v Wade Anthem Studies in Law Eth

by [Nemeth, Charles P.]

$32.83

List Price: $35.00
Save: $2.17 (6%)
add to favourite
  • In Stock - Guaranteed to ship in 24 hours with Free Online tracking.
  • FREE DELIVERY by Wednesday, April 9, 2025 9:59:16 AM UTC

Product Details

  • Anthem Press Brand
  • Nov 12, 2024 Pub Date:
  • 9781839993800 ISBN-13:
  • 1839993804 ISBN-10:
  • English Language
  • 9 in * 0.8 in * 6.02 in Dimensions:
  • 1 lb Weight:
    • 24/24 Online
    • Yes High Speed
    • Yes Protection
    Last update:
...

Money Back

Love it! Use it! Reuse it!

...

Free Shipping

Shipping is on us

...

Free Support

24/24 available

Description

Offers & Discounts

Do not lose our daily
special offers & discounts!

...
This text will examine U.S. Supreme Court cases which highlight, feature and illuminate some facets of natural law reasoning since the Court's decree in Roe v. Wade. For most of our constitutional and legal history, there has been an exhilarating debate about whether natural law commands or encourages certain legal resolutions - even from the time of the Founders. Most would concur that the legal philosophy of Jefferson and other Founders favored a natural law basis for this republic and its corresponding rights. And while the proposed text accepts that the concept and understanding of natural law reasoning has both supporters and detractors in contemporary settings, earlier Supreme Court rulings on controversial subject matter used natural law language with regularity. Since the 1970s, the idea of a perennial, immutable and unassailable natural law has lost favor. And given the recent surge in controversial case law and conflicting decisions on highly charged topics, a return to first principles grounded in nature and natural law might be beneficial. Indeed, the proposed research hopes to gauge its current relevance, usage and reliance in more modern judicial cases.

Last updated on